A Methodological Framework for Co-Creation of Government-Research-Industry Innovation

Inese Suija-Markova

Abstract


Government, industry, and research collaboration is important. Governments are developing instruments for stimulating innovation within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Researchers are expected to focus on solving economic, environmental, and social problems. Enterprises need new solutions to survive in global markets. Traditionally, co-creation is a tool for collaborating between researchers and industry during the innovation development process. In this study, a methodological framework for government-research-industry co-creation in the pre-competitive innovation phase was developed and tested. It was piloted with a group of six researchers and nine enterprises from Latvia co-creating solutions for sustainable food packaging. The experiment was a targeted intervention by a public administration body to facilitate industry-research collaboration, thus strengthening SMEs competitiveness. The study demonstrated that the developed methodological framework is a useful tool for professionals involved in the day-to-day facilitation of collaboration between researchers and businesses, such as business support and development professionals and innovation project managers. It is appropriate for laying the groundwork for more in-depth industrial research or experimental development between researchers and businesses. Professional moderation is critical in the co-creation process, and it is more enriching if the pool of participating enterprises consists of SMEs and larger enterprises covering the value chain of the explored topic. The bridging co-creation phase is appropriate for an online environment, whereas the experimental co-creation phase would benefit more from taking place in a physical setting. To achieve better results, it is important to choose narrower and more clearly defined problems. The co-creation process aids in the development of collaborative communication skills, the generation of ideas in a diverse group, and overall digital literacy.

Keywords:

co-creation; government-research-industry collaboration; open innovation; small and medium-sized enterprises; smart specialization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Jaakkola, E. (2012). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem-solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.008

Bertello, A., Ferraris, A., De Bernardi, P., et al. (2022). Challenges to open innovation in traditional SMEs: an analysis of pre-competitive projects in university-industry-government collaboration. Int Entrep Manag J, 18, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00727-1

Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration, Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006

European Commission. (2022). What is smart specialisation. Smart Specialisation Platform. Retrieved on 30 September 2022 from https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/what-we-do

European Commission. (2012). Entrepreneurship 2020 action plan. Reigniting the entrepreneurial Spirit in Europe. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2012) 795 final, Brussels.

Foray, D., Goddard, J., Goenaga Beldarrain, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., et al. (2012). Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3), S3 Smart Specialisation Platform, IPTS Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Seville. Retrieved on 30 September 2022 from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/smart_specialisation/smart_ris3_2012.pdf.

Haataja, M., Hautamäki, A., Holm, E., Pulkkinen, K., & Suni, T. (2018). Co-creation a guide to enhancing the collaboration between universities and companies. University of Helsinki. Retrieved from https://blogs.helsinki.fi/andaction/files/2018/02/HY_Co_creation_web.pdf

McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). Smart specialisation, entrepreneurship and SMEs: issues and challenges for a results-oriented EU regional policy. Small Bus Econ, 46, 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9707-z

McMeekin, N., Wu, O., Germeni, E. et al. (2020). How methodological frameworks are being developed: evidence from a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol, 20(173). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01061-4

Suija-Markova, I., Mezaka, I., Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2022). Barriers to Innovation in the Knowledge Intensive Business Services. The 26th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics: WMSCI 2022. II, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.54808/WMSCI2022.02.148

Vidzeme Planning Region (2019). Action plan for further sustainable development of smart specialization in Vidzeme region 2020-2022. Vidzeme Planning Region, retrieved on 28 September 2022 from http://www.vidzeme.lv/lv/regionalie_petijumi/50/132838/.

https://doi.org/10.7250/scee.2022.011




DOI: 10.7250/scee.2022.010

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Inese Suija-Markova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.