The Revival of Protectionism in the Modern World: Case Study of Uzbekistan

Regina Gaynulina

Abstract


Since the publication of The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith, in which market-based economy free from government interventions was systematically defended, economics and philosophy have mostly parted ways, culminating in a clear distinction between how most economists and philosophers view the global economic order. Although it is now clear that trade liberalization, unlike protectionism, paves the way for economic development, many still argue that the countries are better off implementing protectionist measures. Even the developed countries today seem to slowly return protectionist policies, while the developing ones commonly employ them fully. In this research work, the author will analyze the recent trends in trade policymaking as well as conduct a case study of Uzbekistan to see what impact the decades of protectionism and recent trade-liberalization reforms made on the country’s economic growth. The aim of the work is to identify and reveal the features of new protectionism in the context of globalization of the world economy and the related contradictions and to provide recommendations for Uzbek authorities based on the empirical findings. There is a very limited number of researches made in the field of trade policy in Uzbekistan, therefore this work will contribute to both Uzbekistan and global scientific societies, as the case study can be used to improve the current situation in the country, as well as it can be applied to the countries of a similar economic background (precisely present at the same geographic region) for the same purposes. The hypothesis proposed for this research is: When the country implements high protectionist measures it faces lack of money inflow, which consequently leads to a slow-down in economic growth.


Keywords:

Competition; Free-trade; Foreign direct investment; Uzbekistan; Trade barriers; Protectionism.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dawar, K. (2018). Protectionism and international diplomacy. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/603874/EXPO_STU(2018)603874_EN.pdf

Evenett, S. (2017). Cloth for Wine? The Relevance of Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage in the 21st Century (1st ed., p. 3). London: CEPR Press.

Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. (2018). International economics (11th ed., pp. 57-64). Harlow [etc.]: Pearson Education.

Mallick, N. (2014). A Large Country Imposing Import Tariff: Optimal Import Tariff in Terms of Adjustment Weights. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2501155

McGowan, D. (2017). Digging Deep to Compete: Vertical Integration, Product Market Competition and Prices. The Journal Of Industrial Economics, 65(4), 683-718. doi: 10.1111/joie.12157

Pogge, T. (2016). The Hunger Games. Food Ethics, 1(1), 9-27. doi: 10.1007/s41055-016-0006-9

Regional Economic Outlook: Middle East and Central Asia | MCD REO | World economic and financial surveys. (2018). Retrieved 14 April 2018, from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO/MECA/Issues/2018/10/02/mreo1018

Trushin, Eskender. 2019. Uzbekistan - Toward a New Economy: Country Economic Update (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/866501562572675697/Uzbekistan-Toward-a-New-Economy-Country-Economic-Update

WTO (2015). Reports on recent trade developments news archive. WTO. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/archive_e/trdev_arc_e.htm




DOI: 10.7250/scee.2019.003

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Regina Gaynulina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.